Quote:

---

Another win against immigration: "The Supreme Court will allow the Trump administration to enforce, for now, its "public charge" immigration restriction, lifting a pair of preliminary injunctions issued by federal judges. The administration’s rule would restrict immigrants entering the United States if the government believes they will rely on public assistance, such as housing or health care benefits."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-allows-trump-administration-to-enforce-public-charge-immigration-restriction?fbclid=IwAR1D6d0lX8wpTxWUVDkWAGIc9z93xE02JxwGfryzsyNGJkT0snZqsTnfOBI

---

Quote:

---

Jenny said:
well, he didn't get impeached

---

Quote:

---

Spicemaster said:
*SKIP OVER AND 1ST SYMPATHY POAST

---

Quote:

---

XUL said:
Build the wall, stop asylum seekers, stop chain migration, stop all immigration, and go America first! Blood and soil.

MAGA

Who here is voting for America first?

 

---

I love how you are using a quote originally coined by German National Socialist (Nazi) ideology to peddle for Trump's re-election. Not surprising considering your apparent growing denial of the holocaust, but interesting considering your disdain for being labelled a racist or nazi for your ideas and political choices...

I also love how your entire argument is racially motivated. You haven't mentioned anything other than "keep out the immigrants, promote literal nazi ideologies, Trump 2020".

Hard pass.

Quote:

---

Spicemaster said:
*SKIP OVER AND 1ST SYMPATHY POAST

---

Quote:

---

XUL said:
Being labeled racist doesn't bother me, but we don't see ourselves that way.

Separatist would be more accurate. And we pray that our black American counterparts do well and stay healthy.

---

Lol nice catch on the "segregationist" to "separatist" edit. However the argument used to try and differentiate separatist from segregationist is that voluntary segregation can be beneficial, as opposed to government mandated or enforced segregation.

However, you've argued in the past for government-enforced segregation based on racially-motivated control of demographics. Which is certainly not voluntary segregation...and therefore your belief system cannot fall under the guise of separatist.

Your ideas are thus defined as racial segregationism, which is also a form of racial discrimination, which as we have previously discussed is a subset of racism. Ergo, you are a racist, regardless of how you see it. You can call a dog turd a candy cane, but I bet even you wouldn't eat that newly named candy cane.

Quote:

---

XUL said:
I don't deny the holocaust. I dispute the numbers. Reparations were paid to Jews and an increase in deaths meant more reparations. There are no total counts of bodies, just estimates made by mostly Jewish people.

---

Quote:

---

So tell me again how you aren't a holocaust denier?

---

Quote:

---

XUL said:
Being labeled a racist is irrelevant to me.   

I support voluntary balkanization/segregation and a Separatist region if we are pushed to a corner. The region might consist of several very white states where land is bought up and used appropriately. Our innate tribalism must be had.

The main point of all of this is to maintain homogeneity and tradition in order to stave off anomie. Honoring family tradition, honoring thy mother and father, honoring our ancestors and how they lived, honoring God, honoring the sabbath, and so forth. These sorts of things stave off anomie. This is why you see leftists who hate nuclear families, hate the Church, and hate anything to do with traditional America. They seek the destruction of traditional American culture and to replace it -- hence the great replacement.

---

So now you are advocating for balkanization, or the division of unified geographical areas into smaller autonomous areas that are usually hostile or uncooperative towards one another? As a backup, you advocate succession from America for whites? You realize that you are talking about the end of These United States, specifically based on racial concerns, and thus your ideas, motivations, and conclusions are not too far off from the southern white slave owners who's culture you just denied in another thread.

This seccession would not happen peacefully in America, we know this from historical events, and thus you are advocating for ideas that ultimately lead to racially-motivated violence, and in TSL of all places.

You should choose your terms carefully, since you seem to like using/misusing big vocabulary words. This is especially true in the context of the subject matter at hand.

Quote:

---

XUL said:
Because I don't deny the holocaust. I dispute the number of Jewish deaths.

---

And as I've already explained, you denying that you are a holocaust denier by denying the definition of "holocaust denier" doesn't make you not-a-holocaust-denier.