Welcome to the Growery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
Tank333
Psychotic Hippie
Registered: 08/19/10
Posts: 1,241
Loc: Washington
Last seen: 4 years, 11 months
|
|
Quote:
lampshadehelmet said: The venting thing is in a Barry Cooper DVD... What I would be more concerned about with the venting of hot air is that, if you live in a cold area and vent outside, then you are going to have steam flying out of your house in odd places.
In the daytime this can be confusing to people and cause alarm..."where there is smoke there is fire" , well where there is steam venting irregularly, people will draw the same conclusions and bring unwanted attention.
I had the idea to either tie my exhause into the house's exsisting vent system, or to put a Y on the dryer's vent, and push it out in a place that hot air is expected to be coming from...
-------------------- My best run so far
|
KaptKid
Spaced Pirate
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 5,615
Loc: Bright Side of the Sun
Last seen: 1 year, 28 days
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: Tank333]
#540173 - 03/25/11 09:34 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I put mine into the sewer. Never worried about it.
-------------------- Child of the 60's, Tripping ever sence.
|
FunkyBlunts
Mr Nice
Registered: 09/06/09
Posts: 72
Last seen: 13 years, 7 months
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: Data]
#540365 - 03/26/11 12:43 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
agmotes165 said: by using CFL's you are actually generating more heat
Hmmmm I find that hard to understand
A 250 watt CFL can be touched with the hand yet a 250 watt HPS is absolutely cooking and would burn you if you touched it and they stick out like a sore thumb with thermal imaging cams.
I don't think whatever is generated by a small CFL would be visible. Especially considering it would be constantly being vented out by cool air.
I spose you mean you have to use many more lights to get the same lumens then that would then increase the heat output by comparison? I think I get it...
We are talking about 3-4 plants though and were think of using 2 x 250 watt CFLs . One the flowering type and one the veg type but we just gonna run both through the whole process to get a full spectrum for the whole grow.
|
Flying_Dog
Last man standing
Registered: 02/24/11
Posts: 410
Loc: Underground
Last seen: 9 years, 26 days
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: FunkyBlunts]
#540420 - 03/26/11 03:43 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Just buy a really over sized can for the tent. With that little wattage there should be almost no smell especially if you keep a constant negative pressure in the tent. Sound would be the largest issue. Make sure you dry and trim in the tent then vaccum seal it up and there should be no odor worries.
|
the man
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 825
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: Flying_Dog]
#540429 - 03/26/11 04:22 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
* misinfo * you need to look at actual wattage. prob 45 watter but those get pretty hot actually...
Edited by the man (03/26/11 04:54 PM)
|
Flying_Dog
Last man standing
Registered: 02/24/11
Posts: 410
Loc: Underground
Last seen: 9 years, 26 days
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: the man]
#540430 - 03/26/11 04:27 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
|
the man
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 825
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: Flying_Dog]
#540435 - 03/26/11 05:05 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
i was thinking for a cheapo set up hardwarestore regular socket CFLs.
|
muse42
Zomberrific
Registered: 04/20/10
Posts: 1,000
Loc: West Coast
Last seen: 13 years, 1 month
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: the man]
#540500 - 03/26/11 09:31 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I use a homemade scrubber and I live in a small apt. I just grew Northern Lights and vent into my living area from a closet. I had no trouble with smell growing 4 plants when everything was closed up. When I had the door to my cab open, now that's a different story. My apt peeps always give notice upon entering and I never leave my door open when I'm away, NEVER! The most dangerous part for me is during the veg cycle when everything is running 24/7. During flowering, I leave lights on during the night and shut everything down durning the day. I had my apt peeps in twice during my last grow and they said nothing. Good luck!
-------------------- It looks like it's going to be another Gravity Bong type day...
|
Data
That Guy
Registered: 08/12/08
Posts: 4,038
Loc: Southwestern US
|
Re: Efficiency of carbon filters ?? [Re: muse42]
#540519 - 03/26/11 09:57 PM (13 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
I spose you mean you have to use many more lights to get the same lumens then that would then increase the heat output by comparison? I think I get it...
yes, your light conversion efficiency is lower in CFLs than in HIDs, so for 250W of electricity will give you X amount of lumens for CFL's, the same amount of electrical input will give you >X amount of lumens. When you put in 250W of electricity, some of that gets converted into electromagnetic radiation in the form of visible light, and all other types of EMR both above and below the wavelengths of visible light, the infrared radiation will contribute to heat problems, but the rest of the unconverted electricity is dissipated as waste heat from the ballast and through the bulb. So the higher your lumen output per X amount of electricity, the less heat you are going to generate.
The best way I can think to make up an analogy is to think of the light/ballast combo as your body. The electricity going into the system is food. The more efficient your body is at extracting and utilizing calories, the lower the mass of shit is gonna be rejected out of the back end, the shit being the analogy for waste heat. Simple mass balance in this analogy but its the same thing with the lights just an energy balance, which i guess is essentially the same thing and oh I'm rambling now. Sorry for the windy post I'm a little high
anyway, the reason the CFL's are cooler running is just that, they operate at a lower temperature than the HIDs. But if you look at the geometry of the bulb, CFL's have a crapton of surface area to spread that heat over. Total heat transfer is very simply defined as the heat transfer coefficient (U) times the area of heat exchange surface (A) times the temperature difference b/w the surface and the ambient air. This can be a lot more complicated for more exact numerical answers but for this concept simple is better. So assuming that the glass thickness is essentially the same for each bulb type, your U is going to be the same. Therefore if the surface area is way higher in one bulb than the other, then the temperature difference can be a lot lower in the bulb with higher surface area for the same amount of total heat transfer. This is why the surface feels a lot cooler, when in actuality the bulb is dissipating more heat than the higher temperature HID bulb.
Think of the surface area as the cross-sectional area of a pipe. The HID light would be a very small diameter pipe, and the CFL would be a huge diameter pipe. In order to get the same total flow rate through each pipe in gallons per hour, the velocity and thus the pressure difference across the pipe (the amount of push) would need to be much higher in the small diameter pipe than the large diameter pipe. The pressure difference or push in this analogy stands for the temperature difference in each bulb with the ambient air temp.
Okay im done going all crazy with the engineering bullshit...sorry about getting overly excited I love science
Peace and love, agmotes165
-------------------- “The Universe is under no obligation to make sense to you” -NDT
| |
|
|
|
|