Welcome to the Growery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
|
 Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
 coda
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,736
|
 Re: POLE: 400w HPS *or* 1000w MH for flowering, what would you use?  [Re: Triptonic] 1
#349495 - 01/18/10 04:56 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Every one here just needs to chill out a bit and get off each others dicks.
Inverted - no, i never felt like you were attacking me. Just voicing my own opinion.
Everyone else - Keep it civil in these discussions. We're all here to learn, not fuck around in a dick measuring contest. It's ok to disagree with someone, but please don't let it degrade into a flame war or threads will be locked and people banned.
Thanks!
--------------------
MFDoom666: sobriety kills my buzz every time.
|
Triptonic
Registered: 06/13/08
Posts: 15,581
Loc: 
|
Re: POLE: 400w HPS *or* 1000w MH for flowering, what would you use? [Re: coda] 2
#349500 - 01/18/10 05:00 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
 I was mainly just sick of seeing Inverted claiming to be right all the time, when he clearly isnt. Especially in this thread. But I'm done now 
|
 marrbellade
Stranger
Registered: 10/05/09
Posts: 31
Last seen: 14 years, 6 months
|
Re: POLE: 400w HPS *or* 1000w MH for flowering, what would you use? [Re: Triptonic] 1
#349529 - 01/18/10 05:46 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!...........so was that HPS or MH?
AHHHHH......i think i got it thank you
|
Fick
Stranger than you
Registered: 03/06/10
Posts: 37
Last seen: 12 years, 9 months
|
Re: POLE: 400w HPS *or* 1000w MH for flowering, what would you use? [Re: coda] 1
#380892 - 03/09/10 08:35 PM (14 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Geez, I hate to blow my first post like this, but I absolutely must get in on this dick measuring.
I'm pushing a strong four inches. Almost five. Just want to see where I stand percentile wise...
Anyhow, I've been lurking here a while, love the forum and the people. This is really the first flame laden post I've seen, and yet, it was entertaining.
Glad to be here, questions to come....
--------------------
"Don't do drugs because if you do drugs you'll go to prison, and drugs are really expensive in prison." - John Hardwick
|
keepITLegalFellas
airo trials
Registered: 10/12/10
Posts: 27
Last seen: 13 years, 10 months
|
 Re: POLE: 400w HPS *or* 1000w MH for flowering, what would you use? [Re: Inverted] 1
#499414 - 11/19/10 12:48 PM (14 years, 6 days ago) |
|
|
Ive been thinking of replacing my 250 MH with another T5 for Veggin. I have a T5 for propagation and cloning and love it. However the 250 MH seems as hot as the 1000 cool tube HPS. Waiting till I can add a fan. I want to try starting my flowering under the 250 where I can get a little closer and run co2. After 3 weeks moving on down the line the next 6 under the 1k cool tube HPS, No co2. I know everything is not ideal, but I gotta use what I got till I can get some patients.
--------------------
I do not condone or condemn. This is my disclaimer, as all my post are complete fiction. Furthurmore any reason for lurking here is swim's and does not concern me.
|
scar420
Stranger
Registered: 12/08/10
Posts: 15
Loc: The great white north
Last seen: 13 years, 9 months
|
Re: POLE: 400w HPS *or* 1000w MH for flowering, what would you use? [Re: coda] 1
#519743 - 01/27/11 11:33 AM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
This is info I got from a indoor growing specialist which comes from proven research. MH lamps will be effective for the first two weeks of flowering, it is actually more beneficial to the plant as it does not seek out that yellow-red spectrum which hps gives off until that second to third week of flowering, but hps does indeed produce denser compact flowers, and mh will give you potency and fluff. Apparently using both in cojunction is the way to go...
I did read somewhere about a bulb that utilizes both features, forgot the name.
Edited by scar420 (01/29/11 12:15 AM)
| |
|
|
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Edit 
Reply 
