Quote:

---

Rider420 said:
Wow thanks for the confirmation about who you are and what you are about.

While I smoke a joint and try to help people enjoy what they do you worry about being perfect. That's just something I've never seen in anyone I've ever smoked with but the majority of non smokers I know are like that.

Good luck buddy and merry Christmas

---

And you've been assuming things about me from the get-go. I guess that comes with the territory for someone who thinks that a few google searches makes them an authority on a subject, even when someone literally spoon-feeds the topic to them.

You may be trying to help people, but posting your incomplete knowledge as truth, and then attacking anyone who corrects the gaps in your knowledge (also in an effort to help tokers and growers, knowledge is power after all), is not helpful. Its toxic and not indicative of a person who is truly willing to learn and grow.

If you think you know more about polyploidy, fasciation, and whorled phyllotaxy, then prove it. Ad hominems, bandwagon fallacies, and false dichotomies are ineffective at proving your point, as is alluding to your excess of understanding and wisdom about the topic that you conveniently fail to prove in your posts, or your gross stereotyping of "true smokers" vs "non smokers". All you prove when you post this way is that you know how to use google, are incapable of differentiating logical conclusion and fact from unvalidated assumption, and are otherwise full of shit.

I'll gladly admit that I'm wrong when proven so, until then, I know what I know, and I will continue to post why someone is wrong if I know it to be the case.

Merry Christmas, Rider 

Quote:

---

Data said:


I'll gladly admit that I'm wrong when proven so, until then, I know what I know, and I will continue to post why someone is wrong if I know it to be the case.

Merry Christmas, Rider 

---

Quote:

---

Rider420 said:

Quote:

---

Data said:


I'll gladly admit that I'm wrong when proven so, until then, I know what I know, and I will continue to post why someone is wrong if I know it to be the case.

Merry Christmas, Rider 

---

Cool dude your perfect and you know it. Best of luck with that ego of yours.

Narcs post about how cannabis is harmful as sure as themselfs as you are.


I smoke cannabis to help me be happy I know it reduces my ability to play chess and be right all the time but its a trade off I'm willing to make. Why would you smoke cannabis if you want to be right all the time? Judging by your long winded answers you don't smoke at all! And your constant bragging about what you claim to have done proves it. I've called it before and will again you do not add up, way to many inconsistencies to be what you claim you are.

---

Think what you want, Rider. But some people can smoke cannabis and also post intelligent content. You do it pretty often, you just aren't right now. 

Like I said before, this was a discussion until you came and turned it into a dick-measuring contest because I corrected you. You claim to be happy and chill, yet here you are continuing to argue with me when you have no leg to stand on. You know more than I do about particular topics, and I know more than you do about particular topics. This situation is the latter, and you're being a baby about it. I never claimed that I was perfect, I claimed that I knew the difference between fasciation and polyploidy, I have stated this clearly for you multiple times, you just aren't listening.

And now you're turning this into "Data is a non-smoking academic government shill who thinks pot is bad for you, its obvious because he was mean to me and sometimes posts when he's sober", because you don't have shit to back up your BS posts about the original topic, and I think you're starting to realize that you made an ass out of yourself.

Your posts are making you less credible by the minute, smoke a little and chill, dude.

Quote:

---

kreg said:
I'm not reading any of this shit
 
lol yall take it to the thunderdome

---