|
SmOakland
Now with Grow!
Registered: 05/31/09
Posts: 2,662
Loc: Oaktown to NOLA
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#489182 - 10/18/10 02:06 PM (14 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
niteowl do you know what "positive feedback" is? Look it up and it should help you comprehend this topic. and you have failed to address the fact that we are releasing huge amounts of greenhouse gases besides CO2.
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: SmOakland]
#489188 - 10/18/10 02:33 PM (14 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Yea, I understand about "positive and negative feedback' and our effect on that system is minimal as well. You forget that there are natural forces on the planet that already add these greenhouse gasses to the planet at a much higher rate than we do
Everyone is severely underestimating the planets ability to cope with these naturally occurring chemicals. All the doomsday scenarios put forth by the Global Warming Fearmongers are not supported by computer models. They are just scare tactics.
Quote:
Global warming alarmists have claimed that increases in the trace gas CO2 will cause runaway global warming, based on outputs from mathematical climate models running in super-computers. Their contention is that a doubling of CO2 concentration will raise global temperatures from 3 to 5 degrees Centigrade.
However, sensors aboard the ERB satellite (released into orbit by astronaut Sally Ride from the Space Shuttle) observed energy emissions from the upper atmosphere that were 7 times the expected (model) values during the warm years of 1989 to 2000.
That is evidence that the atmosphere cannot contain excess heat. The re-radiation of heat into outer space is termed a “negative feedback” that mitigates climate change. The new calculations indicate that a doubling of CO2 concentration will increase global temperatures by only 0.3 degrees C, an effect so small as to be swamped by normal climate variation (and thus be undetectable, more or less).
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
DieCommie
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 214
Loc: West of the Wall
Last seen: 9 years, 5 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#489244 - 10/18/10 07:40 PM (14 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I agree with some of what you are saying. Don't confuse scientific evidence of anthropogenic global warming with crazy doomsday scenarios. They are very different claims made by very different people with different agendas. They need to be addressed separately and not confounded with each other.
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: DieCommie]
#489250 - 10/18/10 07:56 PM (14 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
The scientific evidence says that the CO2 we put out does LITTLE to warm the climate. Our influence is primarily seen in local areas. The Big Urban City will be warmer than the surrounding countryside.
That's about as far as it goes.
The claims that the CO2 we produce are going to cause global warming so severe that the ocean could rise ~20ft in 100 years is absolute rubbish. Even if we doubled the current C02 emissions we still would only have a negligible effect on global weather.
Any global warming that's happening is simply a part of Earths natural cycle. So the whole 'Humans are Causing Global Warming' thing = A bunch of hot air, started by politicians, fanned by the sheep that buy into their bullshit and broadcast in the media for ratings.
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#503314 - 12/05/10 11:13 PM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Here are some more facts disputing the 'Man-made Global Warming Hoax'
Quote:
Temperatures: - Global surface temperatures have increased only about 0.6°C in the last 100 years. (IPCC) - Global temperature has averaged only 57°F in the last 100 years. (NOAA) - The warmest year in the United States was 1934. (NASA)
Sea Level Rise: - Global mean sea level has risen only about 6 inches in the last 100 years. (Based on tidal gauge data) (IPCC) - Global mean sea level rise is in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 mm/yr. (Based on tidal gauge data) (IPCC) - No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected. (IPCC) - 20 feet of sea level rise would take 3048-6096 years. (Based on tidal gauge data) (IPCC) - Sea level has only been monitored by satellite altimetry since 1992 with an uncertainty of 3-4 mm. (University of Colorado)
Carbon Dioxide: - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a minor greenhouse gas. - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere have risen by about 30% (280-370 ppmv) over the past 100 years. (IPCC) - Ice core records show Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels lag behind Temperature changes by 600-1000 years. (Source) (Source) - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) did not end the last Ice Age. (Source) - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is only about 0.038% of the atmosphere. (NASA) - Carbon Dioxide accounts for about 4.2-8.4% of the greenhouse effect. (Source) - Humans can only claim responsibility for about 3.4% of carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere annually. (Source) - Water Vapor + Clouds account for about 90-95% of the greenhouse effect. (Source) (NASA) - U.S. Carbon Emissions Fell 1.3% in 2006 (Source)
"Consensus": - Anthropogenic ("Man-Made") Global Warming is an unproven Theory (hypothesis). - There is no 'Consensus' that Global Warming is"Man-Made". (Source) - There is no 'Consensus' that Global Warming will cause Catastrophic Climate Change. (Source) - Science is not determined by 'Consensus' but by the Scientific Method.
Ecology: - U.S. Forest land area increased from 747 million acres in 1997 to 749 in 2002. (U.S. Forest Service) - Since the 1950s, timber growth has consistently exceeded harvest. (U.S. Forest Service)
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
Harry_Ba11sach
cannoisseur
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 11,753
Loc: Nepal
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#503352 - 12/06/10 07:54 AM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
RIIIIGGGHHHTTT.
You copy pasta from a site called "Globalwarmingscaretactics.com" and expect us to consider them legitimate scientific claims? Even the "sources" they cite are bullshit. Junkscience.com? No thank you, I'll discuss REAL science.
Go to www.OMFGGLOBALWARMINGISREAL!!!!!!11.COM and read around. of course you won't, because any website with that retarded of a name obviously is way too biased to be considered legitimate.
about 3/4 of the shit on your retarded little list is completely erroneous but I'm not even going to waste time rebuking it. You have fun with your "beliefs," turning science into a religion.
--------------------
|
Thebooedocksaint
Dead Dictator
Registered: 05/11/09
Posts: 5,730
Loc: Wild & Free
Last seen: 2 days, 10 hours
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#503365 - 12/06/10 09:46 AM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
is my opinion on this topic.
I'm not even going to try to argue this one.
-------------------- "Je pense, donc je suis (I am thinking, therefore I am)." -Rene Descartes
|
THEBats
The Bridge Master
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 8,488
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: Thebooedocksaint]
#503425 - 12/06/10 04:02 PM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
wow you're still going on about this?
-------------------- kickin-two-hundo said:
you know what i did in english class? I came to class stoned out of my mind every day, i chugged vodka in the back of class, i put dead fish in the ceiling tiles. i put a gallon of old milk and orange juice in the file cabinet before winter vacation. i brought snakes in a tied up sweater and let them loose during class. i didnt go to school to learn, i went because i had to. i didnt care, and i didn't fucking listen to that stupid bitch. and i still don't fucking care. i tore the pages out of her books and burned them, and threw away all the books in the class, two books per day.
|
THEBats
The Bridge Master
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 8,488
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#503506 - 12/06/10 07:07 PM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
niteowl said: Here are some more facts disputing the 'Man-made Global Warming Hoax'
Quote:
Temperatures: - Global surface temperatures have increased only about 0.6°C in the last 100 years. (IPCC) - Global temperature has averaged only 57°F in the last 100 years. (NOAA) - The warmest year in the United States was 1934. (NASA)
Sea Level Rise: - Global mean sea level has risen only about 6 inches in the last 100 years. (Based on tidal gauge data) (IPCC) - Global mean sea level rise is in the range of 1.0 to 2.0 mm/yr. (Based on tidal gauge data) (IPCC) - No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected. (IPCC) - 20 feet of sea level rise would take 3048-6096 years. (Based on tidal gauge data) (IPCC) - Sea level has only been monitored by satellite altimetry since 1992 with an uncertainty of 3-4 mm. (University of Colorado)
Carbon Dioxide: - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a minor greenhouse gas. - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels in the atmosphere have risen by about 30% (280-370 ppmv) over the past 100 years. (IPCC) - Ice core records show Carbon Dioxide (CO2) levels lag behind Temperature changes by 600-1000 years. (Source) (Source) - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) did not end the last Ice Age. (Source) - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is only about 0.038% of the atmosphere. (NASA) - Carbon Dioxide accounts for about 4.2-8.4% of the greenhouse effect. (Source) - Humans can only claim responsibility for about 3.4% of carbon dioxide emitted to the atmosphere annually. (Source) - Water Vapor + Clouds account for about 90-95% of the greenhouse effect. (Source) (NASA) - U.S. Carbon Emissions Fell 1.3% in 2006 (Source)
"Consensus": - Anthropogenic ("Man-Made") Global Warming is an unproven Theory (hypothesis). - There is no 'Consensus' that Global Warming is"Man-Made". (Source) - There is no 'Consensus' that Global Warming will cause Catastrophic Climate Change. (Source) - Science is not determined by 'Consensus' but by the Scientific Method.
Ecology: - U.S. Forest land area increased from 747 million acres in 1997 to 749 in 2002. (U.S. Forest Service) - Since the 1950s, timber growth has consistently exceeded harvest. (U.S. Forest Service)
Also did you bother clicking any of these sources? For instance when it claims 1934 to be the hottest year.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.D.txt
Unless I'm completely misinterpreting the data, 1998 is hotter. 1934 was a hot year in the United States, but still ranks 47th globally, which is more important when talking global climate change.
In fact, globally the top 10 hottest years on record have all occurred since 1998. And 2010 is predicated to take the place of one of the current place holders.
-------------------- kickin-two-hundo said:
you know what i did in english class? I came to class stoned out of my mind every day, i chugged vodka in the back of class, i put dead fish in the ceiling tiles. i put a gallon of old milk and orange juice in the file cabinet before winter vacation. i brought snakes in a tied up sweater and let them loose during class. i didnt go to school to learn, i went because i had to. i didnt care, and i didn't fucking listen to that stupid bitch. and i still don't fucking care. i tore the pages out of her books and burned them, and threw away all the books in the class, two books per day.
Edited by THEBats (12/06/10 07:17 PM)
|
FurrowedBrow
Free yourself from yourself
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 12,045
Loc: Carpal Tunnel
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: THEBats]
#503512 - 12/06/10 07:22 PM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
let me inject some wisdom here, if i may. Global warming is the biggest scam ever. my ice cream aint meltin any faster now than it did 10 years ago!
|
Don King
Keep it in the Ring
Registered: 04/29/10
Posts: 761
Last seen: 14 years, 8 days
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: FurrowedBrow]
#503521 - 12/06/10 07:33 PM (14 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
FurrowedBrow said: let me inject some wisdom here, if i may. Global warming is the biggest scam ever. my ice cream aint meltin any faster now than it did 10 years ago!
They talk about it all the time. What else could global weather scientists talk about? One of the top 2 or 3 largest databases in the world is about weather.
-------------------- Only in America!
|
SmOakland
Now with Grow!
Registered: 05/31/09
Posts: 2,662
Loc: Oaktown to NOLA
Last seen: 4 years, 4 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: Don King]
#505057 - 12/12/10 06:16 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
You need to understand that 100 years is not any significant amount of time in terms of geological history. You would not be able to detect any changes in only 100 years if it were not for humans causing said changes.
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: SmOakland]
#505067 - 12/12/10 07:06 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
Funny that we have only been taking accurate readings for oh lets see....100 years
We have known about the planets warming for sometime now. Its just the politicians who are trying to pin the blame on us so that they can create a new tax for us to pay.
NONE of the predictions made by the ICCP have come to pass.
(and the ICCP is the only organization pushing for the HBGWT)
Read up on how that organization was made and who made it and you will understand why I distrust any information they put out
It's all a bunch of smoke and mirrors
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
eNtranceAsexit
Bang-a-Bang-Boogie
Registered: 11/23/10
Posts: 1,355
Last seen: 4 years, 8 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#505071 - 12/12/10 07:36 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
Who needs science to tell you that humans are too fucked up and selfish to care about their life being good for anyone for more then a minute, anyway?
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: eNtranceAsexit]
#505074 - 12/12/10 07:47 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
Science will tell you that this warming trend started WAY before the industrial age.
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
eNtranceAsexit
Bang-a-Bang-Boogie
Registered: 11/23/10
Posts: 1,355
Last seen: 4 years, 8 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#505078 - 12/12/10 08:03 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
Who cares? "Let me see, maybe I can conceive something better then the next thing to help us forget how to be humane!" seems to be the more accessed route on this planet.
So again, I must ask, who cares?
This is world is doomed to have mutant human sub-strains gallivanting around forever.
And all most everybody cares about is arguing about how to make it last longer? Horrifying.
|
Sir Smokes A-Lot
friend of the aliens
Registered: 09/16/10
Posts: 297
Loc:
Last seen: 13 years, 9 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: Harry_Ba11sach]
#505080 - 12/12/10 08:09 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
-------------------- "Everybody seems to think I'm lazy
I don't mind, I think they're crazy
Running everywhere at such a speed
Till they find, there's no need"
Beatles song
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: eNtranceAsexit]
#505082 - 12/12/10 08:12 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
Whoa dude you either need to seek therapy or simply
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
Sir Smokes A-Lot
friend of the aliens
Registered: 09/16/10
Posts: 297
Loc:
Last seen: 13 years, 9 months
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: niteowl]
#505085 - 12/12/10 08:14 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
Quote:
niteowl said: Whoa dude you either need to seek therapy or simply
Me??
-------------------- "Everybody seems to think I'm lazy
I don't mind, I think they're crazy
Running everywhere at such a speed
Till they find, there's no need"
Beatles song
|
niteowl
GrandPaw
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 4,782
|
Re: Another example of why I don't believe the Global Warming Hoax [Re: eNtranceAsexit]
#505089 - 12/12/10 08:41 PM (14 years, 25 days ago) |
|
|
lol, no, check the reply too mate
Quote:
eNtranceAsexit said: Who cares? "Let me see, maybe I can conceive something better then the next thing to help us forget how to be humane!" seems to be the more accessed route on this planet.
So again, I must ask, who cares?
This is world is doomed to have mutant human sub-strains gallivanting around forever.
And all most everybody cares about is arguing about how to make it last longer? Horrifying.
Quote:
niteowl said: Whoa dude you either need to seek therapy or simply
-------------------- The Ego is a pathological conditionlike a calcareous tumor or cystthat begins growing in the personalityin the absence of hallucinogenic substances-Terence McKenna-
|
|