Israel vs Iran - The Smoke Lounge - Growery Message Board

Home | Community | Message Board

You are not signed in.
New Account

Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Shroomery

Welcome to the Growery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop:

Golden Teacher Liquid Culture For Sale

Red Vein Kratom

Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Kratom Powder for Sale

Jump to first unread post

Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Next > [ show all ]

kyuzo
Stranger Than Fiction

Registered: 07/05/10
Posts: 981
Last seen: 11 years, 11 months

Re: Israel vs Iran

[Re: DeadHearts]
#464384 - 08/20/10 04:54 PM (14 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

DeadHearts said:You believe? Is this a fact or what??

<<<(f) Encouraged by the Director General’s assessment that there has been good progress on the
actions agreed during the Director General’s visit to Tehran in early April 2004 and that the
Agency continues to make progress in gaining a comprehensive understanding of Iran’s nuclear
programme, but noting with concern that after almost two years from when ***Iran’s undeclared***
programme came to the Agency’s knowledge a number of ***questions remain outstanding***, and in
particular *** two questions that are key to understanding the extent and nature of Iran’s enrichment programme***: the sources of all HEU contamination in Iran and the extent and nature of work
undertaken on the basis of the P-2 advanced centrifuge design,

(g) Noting in this context with serious concern that important information about the P-2
centrifuge programme has often been forthcoming only after repeated requests, ***and in some
cases has been incomplete and continues to lack the necessary clarity*** and also that the
information provided to date relating to contamination issues*** has not been adequate to resolve
this complex matter***

(i) Noting with concern that the Agency’s investigations ***have revealed further omissions*** in the
statements made by Iran, including in the October declaration, in particular concerning the
importation of P-2 components from abroad and concerning laser enrichment tests, which have
produced samples enriched up to 15%, and also that Agency experts have raised questions and
doubts regarding the explanations provided by Iran concerning those programmes, which
require further clarification

2. Deplores, at the same time, the fact that, overall, as indicated by the Director General’s written
and oral reports, Iran’s cooperation has not been as full, timely and proactive as it should have been,
and, in particular, that Iran postponed until mid-April visits originally scheduled for mid-March -
including visits of Agency centrifuge experts to a number of locations involved in Iran’s P-2
centrifuge enrichment programme - ***resulting in some cases in a delay in the taking of environmental
samples and their analysis;***

Calls on Iran to take all necessary steps on an urgent basis to help resolve all outstanding
questions, especially that of LEU and HEU contamination found at various locations in Iran, including
by providing additional relevant information ***about the origin of the components in question and
explanations about the presence of a cluster of 36% HEU particles***; and also the question of the nature
and scope of Iran’s P-2 centrifuge programme, including by providing full documentation and
explanations at the request of the Agency;

Recalls that in previous resolutions the Board called on Iran to suspend all enrichment-related
and reprocessing activities; welcomes Iran’s voluntary decisions in that respect; ***regrets that those
commitments have not been comprehensively implemented*** and calls on Iran immediately to correct
all remaining shortcomings, and to remove the existing variance in relation to the Agency’s
understanding of the scope of Iran’s decisions regarding suspension, including by refraining from the
production of UF6 and from all production of centrifuge components, as well as to enable the Agency
to verify fully the suspension;

http://www.iaea.org/Publication...v2004-49.pdf

<<<"The International Atomic Energy Agency can confirm that on 10 June 2010 it received a letter from Iran objecting to the designation of two IAEA safeguards inspectors.

"The IAEA has full confidence in the professionalism and impartiality of the inspectors concerned. The Agency confirms that its report on the implementation of safeguards in Iran, issued on 31 May 2010, is fully accurate.>>>

http://www.iaea.org/Publication...v2004-49.pdf

Quote:

DeadHearts said:Anyways we are talking about a country that is surrounded by countries
we occupy as well as allies and people are throwing their arms up at Iran
like they are some big threat? I think its silly. Its fine to keep them in
line. We do not need another country with nukes and its against policy
anyways I get all that. But all this war talk its fucking stupid. The last
thing this county and entire planet needs right now is another war going on.

I agree. i personally think there are other avenues still to explore. But as I said, it's nearly impossible to defend Iran in this instance.

Quote:

DeadHearts said:Im 25 years old and I am already so sick and fucking tired of these wars.
I mean come on. And how everyone is so quick to back them in this country
is beyond me. We do not have the money nor the resources for this. People
wonder why this country is flat broke. Billions are wasted and thousands of
our people are lost on these agendas that offer no progression of the future
and the future of our children. Its really become sad that we are seeing the
same games played out over and over again up until this present day.

i'm pretty critical of US foreign policy

Extras: