|
 Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
 Google vs Pirate Bay 
#218594 - 04/22/09 10:25 AM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
ROFL . check this out
http://www.google.com/cse?cx=003849996876419856805:erhhdbygrma&ie=UTF-8&q=&sa=Search
notice the first option? 
look like someone else is going to be sued
|
 usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
 Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218596 - 04/22/09 10:28 AM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
haha, wow
|
beatyou
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 2,143
Loc: 512/atx
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218600 - 04/22/09 10:35 AM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
The difference is pirate bay actually hosts the tracking software on it's network & servers, google merely searches trackers and links to them. This is still gray area in some ways, however. Many news publishers (the times/washington post) etc are not happy with "google news" http://news.google.com because it scrapes all the news sites and just links to them, making google a lot of money with no real work put in other than developing the aggregate software which just uses the search DB. i love it
--------------------
this is me on a bar, 3 methrolls (up 4 days), ketamine, and some good acid two years ago.
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: beatyou]
#218601 - 04/22/09 10:45 AM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
thx for highlighting us on this. make sense now. thumb up beatyou
|
still beLIEve
State Property..Again
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 17,167
Loc: a world thats not my own
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218603 - 04/22/09 10:52 AM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
pretty good shit. i mean really, where do you draw the line? gov't needs to stop trying to stop micro-managing the people, and stop trying to stop technology. instead, find new professions and jobs and such. stop trying to save the dying ones.
also - anyone read what thepirate bay sent back to whoevers suing them? i dont have a link but a friend read it to me last night, it was pretty funny.
--------------------
niteowl said:
See, that term pedo gets thrown around a lot.
Is a 16 year old guy having sex w/a 16 year old girl a pedophile?
If not, then how is a 30 year old considered a pedophile for doing the same thing?
I think y'all need to look up the definition for pedophile.
|
usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
|
haha link us
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: usg543]
#218653 - 04/22/09 02:31 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Here it is
Subject: Re: Illegal Dissemination of Apple Intellectual Property
From: anakata
To:
> April 21, 2005
>
> VIA EMAIL
>
> NOT FOR POSTING
>
> Fredrik Neij
> Registrant of
>
> Re: Apple Intellectual Property Disseminated by
>
>
> Dear Mr. Neij:
>
> We represent Apple Computer, Inc. On or before April 21, 2005, the
> site www.piratebay.org was in the process of distributing and/or
> facilitating the distribution of a misappropriated copy of an
> unreleased version of Apple's operating system software, Tiger 10.4,
> Build 8A428. The software constitutes an Apple trade secret and is
> copyrighted.
Awh, come on, I've heard the expression "a few bad apples", but this is
just ridiculous.
> Apple has a well-known, longstanding policy of closely guarding
> information about its unreleased products as trade secrets.
I've heard that before somewhere. I just can't remember where...
> We demand that you immediately disable the torrent and/or tracker and
> prevent further distribution of Apple's trade secret and copyrighted
> material.
We demand that you provide us with entertainment by sending more legal
threats. Please?
> Apple further demands that you provide us with all information
> relating to the posting of torrents enabling the distribution of Mac
> OS X Tiger, Build 8A428, including all log files and tracker files
> associated with such torrents. Apple also demands all information
> related to the identity of the persons who created such torrent files
> and/or who uploaded the software referenced by those torrent files, as
> well as the identities of all individuals who participated in the
> uploading and downloading of Apple's software. If you fail to
> maintain the evidence of this illegal activity, you will be subject to
> severe sanctions. In particular, if you destroy or hide any evidence,
> you will be subject to civil and criminal penalties. Please produce
> all requested information by the end of the day, Friday, April 22,
> 2005.
Even if we had that information, which we don't, do you really think we
would provide it to you?
> Builds of unreleased Apple software are distributed under strict
> confidentiality agreements. Your torrent site appears to be engaged
> in a practice of soliciting and disseminating Apple trade secrets.
> This practice is grounds for both civil and criminal liability. To
> avoid further liability, you must refrain from inducing the breach of
> any Apple confidentiality agreements, soliciting Apple trade secrets,
> and distributing Apple trade secrets on your site.
...Or what? You and Hans Brix will send us angry letters? Fortunately
for you, we don't keep sharks as pets.
> Apple is prepared to take further actions to stop the sites illegal
> activities, and Apple expressly reserves its rights. I am available
> to discuss this matter at any time. If you are represented by counsel
> in this matter, please provide me with the identity of that counsel.
Instead of simply recommending that you sodomize yourself with a
retractable baton, let me recommend a specific model - the ASP 21". The
previous lawyers tried to use a cheaper brand, but it broke during the
action.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> This message and any attached documents contain information from the
> law firm of OMelveny & Myers LLP that may be confidential and/or
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not read,
> copy, distribute, or use this information. If you have received this
> transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply
> e-mail and then delete this message.
Edited by Hydro (04/22/09 02:39 PM)
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218654 - 04/22/09 02:31 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
give me some rep for the investigation damnit.. haha kididng !
|
usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218657 - 04/22/09 02:46 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
dude
go to www.thepiratebay.org
click this image at the bottom of the page: 
then click the 2nd image on that page
|
usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218658 - 04/22/09 02:47 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
also more emails/responses here: http://thepiratebay.org/legal
|
still beLIEve
State Property..Again
Registered: 04/20/08
Posts: 17,167
Loc: a world thats not my own
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: usg543]
#218660 - 04/22/09 02:49 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
i know it was something like
'the opinion of us and our lawyers, is that you are morons'
--------------------
niteowl said:
See, that term pedo gets thrown around a lot.
Is a 16 year old guy having sex w/a 16 year old girl a pedophile?
If not, then how is a 30 year old considered a pedophile for doing the same thing?
I think y'all need to look up the definition for pedophile.
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: usg543]
#218661 - 04/22/09 02:54 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
nice i always wanted to infect my pc myself. ~~!!\
great catch tho. im going to send an email to my boss with it as an attachment . WAR IS ON !
|
usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218665 - 04/22/09 03:14 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
we're all going to jail 
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: usg543]
#218666 - 04/22/09 03:22 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Hydro Was here
|
usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218668 - 04/22/09 03:24 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
just kidding i already miss you
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: usg543]
#218669 - 04/22/09 03:27 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
 
was hoping to find a emo that hang himself.
|
usg543
◕‿◕
Registered: 04/21/08
Posts: 7,259
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: Hydro]
#218670 - 04/22/09 03:46 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
a banez?
|
Hydro
Registered: 04/17/09
Posts: 1,616
Last seen: 14 years, 7 months
|
Re: Google vs Pirate Bay [Re: usg543]
#218672 - 04/22/09 03:49 PM (15 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
usg543 said:
we're all going to jail
Nha i was just fucking around. You see a lots of **Was here in jail**
tho that would be the last place i would promote myself about being there.
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Edit 
Reply 
